Practical insights for dental leaders who want to build thriving teams,
cut stress, and lead with clarity.

A dental practice manager writing notes during a leadership training workshop

The Implementation Gap

September 14, 20266 min read

Why what you learned in March isn’t running in September

Think back to the last training day your practice paid for.

Somebody good stood at the front. The team came back full of it, there were notes, there was a plan, and for a fortnight or so things were noticeably different. Then someone went off sick, the diary got messy, two complaints landed in the same week, and by the end of the month you would have struggled to point at anything that had actually changed.

I stand at the front of rooms for a living, so I’m implicating myself here. The day was probably good. That isn’t the problem.

The problem is the distance between what a practice knows and what a practice does, and in most practices that distance is the most expensive thing in the building. It’s also the thing nobody is looking at, because it doesn’t appear on any report.

The cost isn’t the course fee

It’s tempting to price this as wasted money — the fee, the day out of the diary, the cover you had to arrange. That’s the small bit, and honestly, if that were the whole cost I wouldn’t bother writing about it.

The real cost is what it teaches. If this is the third or fourth time the practice has decided something and it still isn’t running, your team have learned something genuinely useful about how this place works: that decisions here are provisional, and that if you keep your head down for six weeks, most things quietly go back to how they were. Nobody says that out loud. Everybody knows it.

And once that’s been learned, the next change is harder than the last one, which is why a practice that has tried everything is so much harder to shift than a practice that has tried nothing. You’re not starting from zero. You’re starting from behind.

It isn’t a motivation problem

The instinct, when something doesn’t stick, is to look at buy-in. Who wasn’t on board, who dragged their feet, who needs a conversation. Sometimes there’s something in that, and it’s almost never the main event.

In my experience there are three reasons the gap opens, and none of them are about how much anyone cares.

  • Nobody owned it. The decision was made in the room, everyone nodded, and it left the room belonging to all of us — which means belonging to nobody. A change with no name against it is a hope, not a plan.

  • The working week wasn’t redesigned to carry it. The new thing was added on top of a week that was already full, and asked to survive on goodwill and memory. Goodwill and memory are the first two things a busy Tuesday takes off you.

  • And the moment it got busy, you stepped back in. Something wasn’t being done the way you’d agreed, you were under pressure, and stepping in was quicker than the alternative. So you stepped in. That decision was correct on the day and expensive by Christmas, and it’s the one I’d watch most closely, because it feels like leadership while it’s happening.

That’s the whole mechanism. Not apathy. Structure, a full week, and a leader who is very good at absorbing problems.

Knowledge is cheap now

Here’s what’s changed, and I don’t think we’ve caught up with it yet. There has never been more good thinking available to a practice owner. Courses, podcasts, conferences, books, people like me writing articles like this one. You could not get through it in a career, and most of it is free or nearly free.

Which means knowing what to do has stopped being the hard thing. Installing it is the hard thing.

Learning is an event. It has a date, a venue, a car park and a feeling of progress at the end of it. Implementation is a rhythm, and you can’t buy a rhythm on a Thursday in Birmingham. That mismatch is why the industry sells so many days and produces so few changed practices — the format we buy in is simply not the format the result comes in.

What actually closes it

Three things, and they’re all duller than a training day. That’s rather the point.

  • One change at a time, with a name against it. Not five. One, maybe two, and that’s it. A practice can absorb one properly embedded change a month and almost nothing on top of that, and I’d rather you got one thing running than seven things half-started. The name matters as much as the change — and it has to come with the authority to make the calls, not just the task. Delegating authority, not tasks. A handover you have to keep checking was never a handover.

  • Build it, then find out whether it holds. Most people design the change and assume that once it’s built the job is done, and then a bad month arrives — two off sick, a complaint, a run of broken days — and you find out what was actually installed and what was only ever agreed. Building half a dozen of these takes about six months at a sensible pace. Finding out which of them survived contact with a bad month takes about another six, and that second half is not a formality, it’s where the result either shows up or quietly doesn’t.

  • A review that asks what came back. This is the one almost nobody does, and it’s the most useful of the three. Sit down and ask one honest question: what has quietly landed back on my plate, and why? Not to tell anyone off. To find out whether the handover was unclear, whether the person needed more authority than they were given, or whether you took it back without noticing and rather enjoyed it. Then hand it over again, at a lower level, with the gap closed.

None of that is clever. All of it is hard to do while you’re busy, which is why most practices know it and don’t do it — which is, satisfyingly, the exact thing this article is about.

The honest bit

This is slower than booking a course, and much less satisfying to buy. There’s no day out, no notes, no mood lift on the drive home. Six weeks in it will feel like you’re barely moving, right at the point where a training day would have felt brilliant and changed nothing.

It is also the only thing that works. Steady progress, not heroic effort, and consistency beating intensity every single time. And you will know inside six months whether it is working, which is a fair enough test to hold anything to.

So before you book anything else, it’s worth finding out honestly how much of what you’ve already decided is actually running. Whether handovers stay handed over. Whether standards hold when the pressure comes on. Whether a new starter meets a proper process or just meets whoever happens to be nearest that morning.

That takes about four minutes to establish, and it’s a more useful four minutes than most days out.

Take the Implementation Gap Scorecard — https://scorecard.marktopley.co.uk/



dental leadershippractice managementteam performanceimplementation gapdelegationdental practice systems
Back to Blog

MENU

SERVICES/ RESOURCES

CONTACT

Mark Topley helps dental leaders create clarity, set standards, and build calm accountability that drives consistent team performance.


CONTACT

01962 587787